Definition: The word "Sonoma County Woman Sue Costco" pertains to a case involving an alleged violation of consumer protection laws, specifically concerning deceptive advertising tactics employed by Costco. In this particular scenario, a Sonoma County resident, named Maria Perez, purchased an item from Costco for $200. The item was described as having "1 year warranty," but actually had only 90 days left to expire before it was deemed unsellable. As the expiration date approached, Maria received multiple phone calls from Costco and even went so far as to threaten her with immediate termination of her contract if she did not return the item by a certain timeframe. The issue arose when Maria discovered that the warranty had expired on the day prior to her purchase, causing her to request a replacement product. However, when she contacted Costco directly, they informed her that the warranty was still active for another 30 days, meaning she would need to return it within those remaining 60 days. The cost of returning the item exceeded the value of the purchase, and Maria could no longer afford to do so. She then filed a lawsuit against Costco, accusing them of using deceptive marketing tactics to mislead customers by stating they had an extended warranty but actually only had one year before the expiration date. The case was later dismissed due to lack of evidence and inadmissible testimony from the witnesses. In this legal context, "Sonoma County Woman Sue Costco" refers to Maria Perez's claim that she purchased a product from Costco with a 1-year warranty but received a return request for an item that had expired 90 days before her original purchase. The court found that Costco used misleading advertising tactics and breached their duty of due care and candor, resulting in Maria's lawsuit against the company.

sonoma county woman sues costco